
Ms. Gilbert's well thought out response to the administration's classification of polar bears as "threatened" neglects to address a few pertinent issues.
1. The addition of polar bears was a political decision rather than a scientific one. The number of polar bears in the artic regions of North America has remained fairly contstant, perhaps even increased over the last 30 years. The administration could not bear (pardon the pun) the stigma of not appearing to care about these beautiful, but dangerous creatures.
2. It is true that the polar ice in artic regions has decreased, but not all polar bears hunt from the ice fields, and there is no credible evidence that the decreasing ice can be attributed to so called "man-made global warming." The earth has been warming and cooling for eons. How can we be so vain as to think that we (mankind) are suddenly the only reason that climates can change. We can't even make it rain. Recent data, rather than computer models, shows that the earth has actually begun a reversal from the trend of increasing temperatures.
The frequently repeated mantra that "The majority of scientists believe the warming is related to manmade greenhouse gases." is a popular fallacy. There is a great deal of rational disagreement over the causes of "global warming." In fact, many of the most respected scientists and meteorologists who originally believed that global warming was man made have now come to believe that this is a completely natural, perhaps solar, phenomenon.
3. This administration has mostly refrained from allowing global warming politics to dictate its policies. I fear that we will not be so fortunate in the next administration - no matter whom we elect.
Not everything is bigger and better in Colorado.
While Colorado's national parks and national forests offer outstanding opportunities for wilderness adventure, if you're thinking o...